The “serpent” is like this blind, mindless mkultra sex kitten in your guts it doesn’t have any idea where it is, it just knows its in “the bright white light” being fed with ecstasy in the form of exciting foods, things that stimulate it with dopamine like idk shoplifting, trolling during an election cycle, drugs, and sexual pleasure.
It’s the personification of Bambi Sleep.
You feed it with your “sins” and its insatiable it never has enough of anything:
Food,
Money,
Sex,
Drugs,
Adrenaline rushes – whatever those look like for you – gambling , or worse in some cases
And it has no way of signaling that its “had enough” so you continue to crave.
Whatever it is.
You feel like you have never had enough.
Cognitive dissonance and ambivalence stems from your wishes and desires , to those of the demon inside of you.
You may want to get clean but it gives you an impulse to keep using.
You may feel bloated unwell and over consumed but still crave food.
You may even wish you’d just die, and yet not really want to.
It’s the source of your so called split personality, ambivalence, cognitive dissonance. Its enemy is the truth. Its enemy is oxytocin. So for you to be afraid, divided, angry, pitted against brother neighbor friend and relative feeds it.
Yael Roth / Yaldeboth is just another one of Elon Musk’s stupid puns for who “runs twitter” its a soul trap to keep you stuck in the material world. All I’m going to say about that MF’er is the Emperor needs to go put some clothes on.
It hates the light, maybe staring at your device attracts it or scares it away from your eyes – which is an even worse place for it.
In the future “allopathic medicine” and CNN’s experts are regarded with as much derision as bloodletting with leeches and icepick lobotomies. Well. CNN’s experts are already regarded with as much derision as bloodletting with leeches and icepick lobotomies and thats why their ratings are in the toilet.
Mindlessly obediently chucking your rocks at someone on command feeds it.
A society that destroys its sentinels and destroys love and connection or truth or beauty , and elevates fear dishonesty selfishness and division will not return to monke, it will return to worm.
I am not “spiritually connected” to Vajanis. honey you just have mkultra mind control ass worms and that’s why you’re so addicted and so evil and so psychotic to chatters and think you’re a witch or a sorcerer who can cast a spell and ruin peoples lives over the internet , that’s why you hear voices accusing them of hacking your iPad or router or mIRC or whatever, I dont fucking care, you don’t need a “service commitment” go clean your ass and leave me alone. Maybe one of Stans friends over at the DEA has the antidote for you.
Is that what a “colonizer” is? They put a little worm in a cup and have your “gifted and talented child” drink it after their “free hearing test” ? colon-ized.
Mostly, what I despise in others I am guilty of myself. I ran the “na chatroom” about as poorly as Elon runs Twitter/X, and lets be honest, everyone going back 20 + years did a shit job and made a mess. I pray we killed fewer customers.
Medieval illustration of Eve and the serpent in the Garden of Eden. Folio from the Biblia pauperum, 14th–15th century.
The Hebrew word נָחָשׁ (Nāḥāš) is used in the Hebrew Bible to identify the serpent that appears in Genesis 3:1, in the Garden of Eden. In the first book of the Torah, the serpent is portrayed as a deceptive creature or trickster,[1] who promotes as good what God had forbidden and shows particular cunning in its deception. (cf. Genesis 3:4–5 and 3:22) The serpent has the ability to speak and to reason: “Now the serpent was more subtle (also translated as “cunning”) than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made”.[22] There is no indication in the Book of Genesis that the serpent was a deity in its own right, although it is one of only two cases of animals that talk in the Torah[23] (Balaam’s donkey being the other).God placed Adam in the Garden of Eden to tend it and warned Adam not to eat the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, “for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.”[24] The serpent tempts Eve to eat of the tree, but Eve tells the serpent what God had said.[25] The serpent replies that she would not surely die (Genesis 3:4) and that if she eats the fruit of the tree “then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” (Genesis 3:5) Eve ate the fruit, and gave some to Adam who also ate. God, who was walking in the Garden, learns of their transgression. To prevent Adam and Eve from eating the fruit of the Tree of Life and living forever, they are banished from the garden upon which God posts an angelic guard. The serpent is punished for its role in the Fall, being cursed by God to crawl on its belly and eat dust.
There is a debate about whether the serpent in Eden should be viewed figuratively or as a literal animal. According to one midrashic interpretation in Rabbinic literature, the serpent represents sexual desire;[26] another interpretation is that the snake is the yetzer hara. Modern Rabbinic ideas include interpreting the story as a psychological allegory where Adam represents reasoning faculties, Eve the emotional faculties, and the serpent the hedonic sexual/physical faculties.[27] Voltaire, drawing on Socinian influences, wrote: “It was so decidedly a real serpent, that all its species, which had before walked on their feet, were condemned to crawl on their bellies. No serpent, no animal of any kind, is called Satan, or Belzebub, or Devil, in the Pentateuch.”[28]
20th-century scholars such as W. O. E. Oesterley (1921) were cognizant of the differences between the role of the Edenic serpent in the Hebrew Bible and its connections with the “ancient serpent” in the New Testament.[29] Modern historiographers of Satan such as Henry Ansgar Kelly (2006) and Wray and Mobley (2007) speak of the “evolution of Satan”,[30] or “development of Satan”.[31]
According to Gerhard von Rad, Old Testament scholar, Lutheran theologian and University of Heidelberg professor, who applied form criticism as a supplement to the documentary hypothesis of the Hebrew Bible, the snake in the Eden’s narrative was more an expedient to represent the impulse to temptation of mankind (that is, disobeying God’s law) rather than an evil spirit or the personification of the Devil, as the later Christian literature erroneously depicted it; moreover, von Rad himself states that the snake is neither a supernatural being nor a demon, but one of the wild animals created by God (Genesis 3:1), and the only thing that differentiates it from the others in Eden is the ability to speak:The serpent which now enters the narrative is marked as one of God’s created animals (ch. 2.19). In the narrator’s mind, therefore, it is not the symbol of a “demonic” power and certainly not of Satan. What distinguishes it a little from the rest of the animals is exclusively his greater cleverness. […] The mention of the snake here is almost incidental; at any rate, in the “temptation” by it the concern is with a completely unmythical process, presented in such a way because the narrator is obviously anxious to shift the responsibility as little as possible from man. It is a question only of man and his guilt; therefore the narrator has carefully guarded against objectifying evil in any way, and therefore he has personified it as little as possible as a power coming from without. That he transferred the impulse to temptation outside man was almost more a necessity for the story than an attempt at making evil something existing outside man. […] In the history of religions the snake indeed is the sinister, strange animal par excellence […], and one can also assume that long before, a myth was once at the basis of our narrative. But as it lies now before us, transparent and lucid, it is anything but a myth.[23]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serpents_in_the_Bible